Rethinking Samir Amin’s Legacy and the Case for a Political Organization of the Global Justice Movement


  • Bonn Juego



Class formation, Class Struggle, Global Justice Movement, New International, Samir Amin, World Social Forum


Juego argues that the new Internationale’s “primary organizational function should be the global coordination of actions of progressive grassroots movements from country to country.” He calls for a ‘learning organization,’ where the new Internationale supports “a continuous dialogue between bottom-up and top-down approaches to decision-making.” He sees it as “[a]kin to a global coordinating council” meaning that it works to integrate and synthesize the “varying initiatives, campaigns, and mass actions at all geographical levels of membership” while remaining mindful of the “dialectics between reform and revolution.” The new Internationale must, moreover, be “grounded on a pragmatic understanding of realpolitik especially in struggles at national and local scales,” and institutionalize a commitment to dialogue, research, and discussion.


Amin, S. (2013). The Implosion of Contemporary Capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press.

Amin, S. (2014). Popular Movements Toward Socialism: Their Unity and Diversity. Monthly Review 66(2), 1–31.

Amin, S. (2018, July 3). It is imperative to construct the Internationale of workers and peoples. Network IDEAS. Retrieved from

Hanin, M. & Afaya, K. (2016, September 21). For the Purpose of Preserving the Trace of Hope: Let us rethink together about the future of the World Social Forum. Retrieved from


Juego, B. (2016). A Commons Perspective on Human-Nature Relations: Analysis, Visions, and Strategies for Alternative Futures. In Humanity and Nature: Traditional, Cultural & Alternative Perspectives (pp. 62–67). Bangkok: Focus on the Global South, The Sombath Initiative, and Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung Southeast Asia.

Juego, B. (2018). Nationalism that violates the dignity of human beings deserves condemnation (an interview with Bonn Juego by Ella Soesanto and Fabian Heppe). In Perspectives Asia: Nationalisms and Populisms in Asia, Issue 7 (pp. 4–8). Berlin: Heinrich Böll Stiftung.

Juego, B. (2018). Authoritarian Neoliberalism: Its Ideological Antecedents and Policy Manifestations from Carl Schmitt’s Political Economy of Governance. Administrative Culture 19(1), 105–136.

Mestrum, F. (2017, November 18). Reinventing the World Social Forum: how powerful an idea can be. Open Democracy / ISA RC-47: Open Movements. Retrieved from

Santos, B. (2006). The Rise of the Global Left: The World Social Forum and Beyond. London: Zed Books.

Santos, B. (2005). The Future of the World Social Forum: The work of translation. Development 48(2), 15–22.

Teivainen, T. (2016). Occupy representation and democratise prefiguration: Speaking for others in global justice movements. Capital & Class 40(1), 19–36.

Trotsky, L. (22 October 1935). Sectarianism, Centrism and the Fourth International. Retrieved from:

Wallerstein, I. (1 November 2016). The World Social Forum Still

Matters. Commentary No. 436. Retrieved from

Wood, E.M. (1995). Democracy Against Capitalism: Renewing Historical Materialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.




How to Cite

Juego, B. (2019). Rethinking Samir Amin’s Legacy and the Case for a Political Organization of the Global Justice Movement. Journal of World-Systems Research, 25(2), 336–344.



Forum: Samir Amin's Call for New International of Workers and Peoples