Contesting Corporate Transgenic Crops in a Semi Peripheral Context: The Case of the Anti-GM movement in India

Devparna Roy

Abstract


Market penetration by the hegemonic core state's agricultural biotechnology firms has been preceded and accompanied by a vigorous anti-genetically modified seeds (anti-GM) movement in semi-peripheral India. To understand the extent of anti-imperialism and anti-capitalism exhibited by the Indian state, it is useful to investigate the character of democratizing forces-such as the anti-GM movement-which interact with and shape the state. I use primary and secondary data sources to analyze the anti-GM movement in India and argue that the movement is anti-corporate without being anti-capitalist. Further, it is counter-hegemonic but not anti-systemic. These four traits reflect the strengths and weaknesses of exemplary coalition-building between right-wing nationalists, centrists, and left activists. The Indian anti-GM movement suffered an early failure when the Indian state commercialized Bt cotton seeds in 2002, following the entry of unauthorized Bt cotton seeds and lobbying by farmers' groups for legalization of Bt cotton seeds. However, an effective coalition between the right-wing, centrist, and left elements was built by about 2006. This was followed by a most significant victory for the anti-GM movement in February 2010, when the Indian state placed an indefinite moratorium on the commercialization of Bt brinjal seeds. A second, more qualified, victory was achieved by the anti-GM movement when the Indian state placed a hold on field trials of GM crops in July 2014. The anti-GM coalition has been successful in pressing ideologically different political parties to take steps against the multinational seed firms based in core states. Further, it has enabled the Indian state to move from a sub-imperialist to an anti-imperialist role regarding GM seeds. But until the anti-GM coalition in India resolves its inner contradictions and becomes resolutely anti-capitalist and anti-systemic, it will not be able to effectively challenge the anti-imperialist Indian state's pro-capitalist stance regarding GM seeds and industrial agriculture.

Keywords


anti-GM movement; India; anti-corporate; coalition politics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bello, Walden. 2002. “Towards a Deglobalized World.” Pp. 292-295, in Global Backlash: Citizen Initiatives for a Just World Economy, edited by Robin Broad. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

Chase-Dunn, Christopher. 1990. “Resistance to Imperialism: Semiperipheral Actors.” Review 13 (1): 1-31.

______. 2006. “Globalization: A World-Systems Perspective.” Pp. 79-105, in Global Social Change: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, edited by Christopher Chase-Dunn and Salvatore J. Babones. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Dutta, Mohan J. 2012. Voices of Resistance: Communication and Social Change. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.

Goldfrank, Walter. 1978. “Fascism and World-Economy.” Pp. 75-120, in Social Change in the Capitalist World-Economy, edited by Barbara H. Kaplan. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

Herring, Ronald J. and Frank Shotkoski. 2011. “Eggplant Surprise: The Puzzle of India’s First Transgenic Vegetable.” Scientific American Worldview. Retrieved March 10, 2015 (http://www.saworldview.com/archive/2011/download-the-2011-issue/).

Hopkins, Terence K. and Immanuel Wallerstein. 1986. “Commodity Chains in the World Economy Prior to 1800.” Review 10(1):157-170.

Jayaraman, K.S. 2012. “India Investigates Bt Cotton Claims.” Nature, February 15, Retrieved March 9, 2015 ( http://www.nature.com/news/india-investigates-bt-cotton-claims-1.10015).

Kuruganti, Kavitha. 2011. “‘Monsanto Quit India’ Day Marked Across the Country.” Alliance for Holistic and Sustainable Agriculture. Retrieved March 10, 2015 (http://www.kisanswaraj.in/2011/12/13/monsanto-quit-india-day-marked-across-the-country/).

McMichael, Philip D. 2000. Development and Social Change: A Global Perspective, 3rd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

______. 2013. “Globalization: A Project in Crisis.” Pp. 75-87 in Global Political Economy: Contemporary Theories, 2nd ed., edited by Ronen Palan. New York: Routledge.

Ramamurthy, Priti. 2004. “Why Is Buying A ‘Madras’ Cotton Shirt A Political Act? A Feminist Commodity Chain Analysis.” Feminist Studies 30(3):734-769.

______. 2011. “Rearticulating Caste: The Global Cottonseed Commodity Chain and the Paradox of Smallholder Capitalism in South India.” Environment and Planning A, 43: 1035-1056.

Ramanna, Anitha. 2006. India’s Policy on Genetically Modified Crops, Asia Research Center Working Paper 15. London: Asia Research Center (ARC), London School of Economics & Political Science.

Roy, Devparna. 2006. Farming “White Gold”: Early Experiences with Genetically Engineered Cotton Production in Gujarat, India, PhD. thesis, Cornell University. USA.

______. 2010. “Of Choices and Dilemmas: Bt Cotton and Self-Identified Organic Cotton Farmers in Gujarat.” Asian Biotechnology and Development Review 12(1):51-79.

______. 2012. “Cultivating Bt Cotton in Gujarat (India): Self-Identified Organic Cotton Farmers Revisited.” Asian Biotechnology and Development Review 14(2):67-92.

______. 2013.”Toward Genetic Democracy? Seed Sovereignty, Neoliberal Food Regime, and Transgenic Crops in India.” Food Sovereignty: A Critical Dialogue. Yale University Conference Paper #64, Retrieved March 10, 2015 (http://www.yale.edu/agrarianstudies/foodsovereignty/pprs/64_Roy_2013.pdf).

______. 2014. “To Bt or Not to Bt? State, Civil Society, and Firms Debate Transgenic Seeds in Democratic India.” Pp. 153-169 in The Neoliberal Regime in the Agri-Food Sector: Crisis, Resilience, and Restructuring, edited by Steven A. Wolf and Alessandro Bonanno. New York: Routledge.

Roy, Devparna, Ronald J. Herring, and Charles C. Geisler. 2007. “Naturalizing Transgenics: Loose Seeds, Official Seeds, and Risk in the Decision Matrix of Gujarati Cotton Farmers.” Journal of Development Studies 43(1):158-176.

Schumpeter, Joseph A. [1941] 1976. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Reprint, New York: Harper & Row.

Scoones, Ian. 2008. “Mobilizing Against GM Crops in India, South Africa and Brazil.” Pp. 147-175 in Transnational Agrarian Movements Confronting Globalization, edited by Saturnino M. Borras Jr., Marc Edelman and Cristobal Kay. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Shand, Hope. 2012. “The Big Six: A Profile of Corporate Power in Seeds, Agrochemicals & Biotech.” Pages 10-15 in The Heritage Farm Companion (summer). Seed Savers Exchange. Retrieved on March 10, 2015 (http://www.seedsavers.org/site/pdf/HeritageFarmCompanion_BigSix.pdf).

Sood, Jyotika. 2013. “Monsanto Told to Quit India.” Down to Earth, August 8. Retrieved on March 9, 2015 (http://www.downtoearth.org.in/content/quit-monsanto-protest-near-parliament).

Subramaniam, Mangala. 2015. “Introduction: States and Social Movements in the Modern World-System.” Journal of World Systems Research.

The Economic Times. 2012. “India’s Seed Industry to Grow by 53 % by 2015: Assocham.” Retrieved on March 10, 2015 (http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2012-12-09/news/35705464_1_hybrid-seeds-quality-seeds-high-yielding-varieties).

Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1984. The Politics of the World-Economy: The States, the Movements, and the Civilizations. New York: Cambridge University Press.

______. 2004. World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

______. 2013. “Whose Interests are Served by the BRICS?” Commentary No. 352, May 1. Retrieved on March 9, 2015 (http://www.iwallerstein.com/interests-served-brics/)




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2015.528

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2015 Devparna Roy

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.