Rents, Power and Governance in Global Value Chains
AbstractThis paper addresses the generation of rents and the distribution of gains in the global operations of governed Global Value Chains (GVCs) and seeks to provide an architecture for analyzing the governance of GVCs. It distinguishes between four sets of rent—gifts of nature; innovation rents; exogenously defined rents; and market power—and three spheres of governance—setting the rules -“legislative governance”; implementing the rules -“executive governance”; and monitoring rules and sanctioning malfeasance -“judicial governance.” The exercise of governance power in GVCs over the generation, protection and appropriation of rents is considered though the lens of four sets of key GVC stakeholders—the corporate sector, civil society organizations, the nation state and supranational institutions. This general analysis is given flesh through three case studies: food-safety standards in GVCs; taxation policies and competition policies. In these sectors, the corporate sector is generally much more effective in governing rent generation and appropriation in the global operations of GVCs than are the three sets of non-corporate stakeholders. From this observation we offer a hypothesis that the capacity of non-corporate stakeholders, including national states, to govern GVCs is contingent upon the extent to which this coincides with the interest of the corporate sector. However, as noted, this balance of power between private and non-corporate actors is a contested terrain and dynamic in nature.
Amsden A. (1989), Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization, New York, Oxford University Press.
Avi-Yonah, R. (2014), “ No country is an Island: Is a Radical Rethinking of International Tax Needed?” Michigan Law. Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series, Paper 380.
Birnbaum, D (2013), Comment: What's the best way to raise standards in Bangladesh?, Just Style. http://www.just-style.com/comment/whats-the-best-way-to-raise-standards-in-bangladesh_id117924.aspx
Chang, Ha-Joon (2002), Kicking Away the Ladder, London: Anthem.
Cucinotta, A., R. Pardolesi, and R. Van den Burgh, (2012) (eds) Post Chicago Developments in Antitrust Law, Edward Elgar
Cusumano M. A. (1985), The Japanese Automobile Industry: Technology and Management at Nissan and Toyota, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Dalle, D, V. Fossati and F. Lavopa, (2013), Industrial policy and developmental space: The missing piece in the GVCs debate, Revista Argentina de Economía Internacional , 2, December.
Fox, E. (2007), ’Economic development, poverty and antitrust’, South Western Journal of Law 211, 13, pp 211-235
Gal, M. and E Fox (2014), ‘Drafting competition law for developing countries Learning from experience’, New York University law and Economics Working Papers 374
Gerber, D., (2002), US Anti-Trust and the Convergence of Competition Laws, The American Journal of Comparative Law, 50, pp. 263 – 296
Gerber, D, (2007), Competition Law and the WTO: Rethinking the relationship , Journal of International Economic Law, 10, pp 707-724
Gereffi, G and T. Sturgeon (2014), Global Value Chain-Oriented Industrial Policy: The Role of Emerging Economies, Deborah Elms and Patrick Low (eds.), Global Value Chains in a Changing World. World Trade Organization, in collaboration with the Fung Institute and the Temasek Centre for Trade and Negotiations.
Gereffi G., J. Humphrey and T. Sturgeon (2005), “The Governance of Global Value Chains”, Review of International Political Economy, 12, 1, pp. 78 - 104.
Gereffi, G. (2014), Global value chains in a post-Washington Consensus world, Review of International Political Economy, 21, 1, pp. 9 - 37
Henson, S and Humphrey, J, (2008), Understanding the Complexities of Private Standards in Global Agri-Food Chains, Institute of Development Studies, Sussex, Leuven.
Henson, S and Humphrey, J, (2009), The Impacts of Private Food Safety Standards on the Food Chain and on Public Standard-Setting Processes, Paper, Prepared for FAO/WHO
Henson, S. and S. Jaffee (2006), Food Safety Standards and Trade: Enhancing Competitiveness and Avoiding Exclusion of Developing Countries, European Journal of Development Research, 18, 4.
Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hollman. H. and W. Kovacic (2011) ‘The ICN ; its past, current and future role’, Minnesota Law Journal 20: 274
International Finance Corporation (IFC), (2012), IFC Performance Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability, Washington.
Kaplinsky, R (1993), "Export Processing Zones in the Dominican Republic: Transforming Manufactures into Commodities", World Development, Vol. 21, No. 11, pp. 1851-1865.
Kaplinsky, R. (2005), Globalization, Poverty and Inequality: Between a Rock and a Hard Place, Cambridge: Polity Press
Kaplinsky and Morris (2015), Thinning and Thickening: Productive Sector Policies in The Era of Global Value Chains, European Journal of Development Research (forthcoming).
Kaplinsky, R and Morris, M (2014). Developing industrial clusters and supply chains to support diversification and sustainable development of exports in Africa, Report for the AfrEximBank,
Kennedy, D. (2013), Law and the Political Economy of the World, Leiden Journal of International Law, 26, pp. 7- 48
Lipietz, A (1987), Mirages and Miracles: the Crises of Global Fordism, Verso, London
Low, P. and J. Tijaja, (2013), Global Value Chains and Industrial Policies, E15, ICTSD and Inter American Development Bank.
New Oxford American Dictionary, http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195392883.001.0001/acref-9780195392883
Neilson, B. Pritchard and H. Yeung, (2014), Global value chains and global production networks in the changing international political economy: An introduction, Review of International Political Economy, 21, 1, pp. 1 - 8
Nolan, P. and J. Zhang (2010), “Global Competition After the Financial Crisis”, New Left Review, 64: 97-108.
OECD (2013), Addressing base erosion and profile shifting, OECD Publishing, Paris
OECD/WTO (2013), Aid for Trade and Value Chains in Information and Communication Technology, Paris.
Piketty T. (2014), Capital in the 21st Century, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Piore M. J. and C. Sabel (1984), The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity, New York: Basic Books.
Ponte, S. and T. Sturgeon, (2014), Explaining governance in global value chains: A modular theory-building effort, Review of International Political Economy, 21, 1, pp. 195 – 223
Poulantzas, N. (1975) Classes in Contemporary Capitalism, NLB: London
Posner, R.A. (1979) “The Chicago School of Anti-trust Analysis”, University Pennsylvania Law Review, vol 127, pp 925-948
Ravenhill, J. (2014), Global Value Chains and Development, Review of International Political Economy, 21, 1, pp. 264 - 274
Seabrooke, L. and D. Wigan, (2014), Global Wealth Chains in the International Political Economy, Review of International Political Economy, 21, 1, pp. 257 - 263
Schumpeter J. A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Teece, D., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. (1992), Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, Berkeley: University of Berkeley Press.
UNCTAD (2013), Trade and Development Report, Geneva: United Nations.
Wade R. H. (1990), Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wilkins, M. (1974). The Maturing of Multinational Enterprise: American Business Abroad from 1914 to 1970, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wright, G and Czelusta, J (2004), The Myth of the Resource Curse, Challenge, 47, 2
World Bank (2009), Reshaping Economic Geography, World Development Report 2009, Washington.
WTO (2008), World Trade Report 2008, Geneva.
Copyright (c) 2018 Dennis Davis, Mike Morris, Raphael Kaplinsky
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.