Reading Hunger and Exhaustion in Clarice Lispector’s A Hora de Estrela
Exploring the Ecology of Women’s Work and Literary Production
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2024.1238Keywords:
Metabolic Rift, Literary Production, Social Reproduction Theory, World-LiteratureAbstract
Coined by Karl Marx in Capital (1867), the “metabolic rift” or “ecological rift” model describes the cycle of extraction, exportation and exhaustion present in agricultural production and, in particular, highlights the unsustainability of this ecologically-unequal exchange. This article integrates world-literary theory, Social Reproduction Theory, and the model of the metabolic rift to explore how Clarice Lispector’s Hour of the Star (1977) illuminates the peripheralization of women within the capitalist mode of production. The increasing pressure on women to be producers causes contradictions in the protagonist’s materiality and exposes the pressures placed on writing—especially women's writing—to meet the expectations of literary production. The novel’s commodity consumption, crisis of social reproduction, and meta-narrational features become windows to view the women’s work and women’s narratives which simultaneously sustain and are exploited by the capitalist mode of production. By connecting these various threads, I suggest the ignored labor of social reproduction under capitalism signals a crisis of consumption and a loss of capitalistic futurity, alerting readers to the unsustainable nature of the current capitalist mode of production.
References
Bhargava, Richa, and Raahat Tara. 2022. “Pink Tax: The Gender Bias in Product Recommendations and Corporate Social Responsibility.” LSE Human Rights. Retrieved October 1, 2023 (https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/humanrights/2022/04/29/pink-tax-the-gender-bias-in-product-recommendations-and-corporate-social-responsibility/).
Bhattacharya, Tithi. 2017. “How Not to Skip Class: Social Reproduction of Labor and the Global Working Class.” Pp. 68–93 in Social Reproduction Theory: Remapping Class, Recentering Oppression, edited by T. Bhattacharya. Pluto Press.
Brouillette, Sarah. 2017. “On Some Recent Worrying over World Literature’s Commodity Status.” Maple Tree Literary Supplement (18).
Casanova, Pascale. 1999. The World Republic of Letters. Harvard University Press.
Damrosch, David. 2003. What Is World Literature? Princeton University Press.
Eaglin, Jennifer. 2019. “‘More Brazilian Than Cachaça’: Brazilian Sugar-Based Ethanol Development in the Twentieth Century.” Latin American Research Review 54(4):927–43. doi: 10.25222/larr.28.
Fausto, Boris. 1999. A Concise History of Brazil. Cambridge University Press.
Federici, Silvia. 1975. Wages Against Housework. Bristol: Falling Wall Press and the Power of Women Collective.
Foster, John Bellamy. 2000. Marx’s Ecology: Materialism and Nature. monthly review press.
Gellert, Paul K. 2019. Ecologically Unequal Exchange: Environmental Injustice in Comparative and Historical Perspective. edited by R. S. Frey, P. K. Gellert, and H. F. Dahms. Palgrave Macmillan.
Harlow, Barbara, Sarah Brouillette, David Thomas, Maria Elisa Cevasco, Joshua Clover, and David Damrosch. 2016. “First Responses.” Comparative Literary Studies 53(3):505–34.
Lispector, Clarice. 2015. Hour of the Star. edited by B. Moser. Penguin Modern Classics.
Marx, Karl. 1991. “Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Volume Three.”
Moore, Jason W. 2011. “Transcending the Metabolic Rift: A Theory of Crises in the Capitalist World-Ecology.” Journal of Peasant Studies 38(1):1–46. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.538579.
______. 2015. Capitalism in the Web of Life : Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. Verso.
Moretti, Franco. 2000. “Conjectures on World Literature.” New Left Review 1(1):54–68.
Niblett, Michael. 2012. “World-Economy, World-Ecology, World Literature.” Green Letters 16(1):15–30. doi: 10.1080/14688417.2012.10589097.
Olivera-Williams, María Rosa. 2015. “Boom,Realismo Mágico– Boom AndBoomito.” Pp. 278–95 in The Cambridge History of Latin American Women’s Literature, edited by I. Rodríguez and M. Szurmuk. Cambridge University Press.
The Editors. 2013. “World Lite.” N+1 (17).
Torres, Cinthya. 2017. “On the Poverty and the Representation of the Other in The Hour of the Star by Clarice Lispector.” Inti: Revista de Literatura Hispánica 85(14):193–203.
Vogel, Lise. 1983. Marxism and the Oppression of Women: Toward a Unitary Theory. Rutgers University Press.
Waldemer, Thomas P. 2008. “Imperfect Harmony: Coca-Cola and the Cannibal Metaphor in Beba Coca Cola, Sangue de Coca-Cola, and A Hora Da Estrela.” Hispanófila 153:97–108.
Warwick Research Collective. 2015. Combined and Uneven Development: Towards a New Theory of World Literature.
______. 2016. “WReC’s Reply.” Comparative Literature Studies 53(3):535–50. doi: 10.5325/complitstudies.53.3.0535.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Hannah Gillman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
