Ecological Unequal Exchange
Winners and Losers in Global Raw Material Trade and Consumption
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2025.1298Keywords:
Trade, Inequality, Material Flow Analysis, Ecological Unequal ExchangeAbstract
The Marxist theory of unequal exchange challenges the idea that trade never results in outright losses. As a biophysical process, ecological unequal exchange reveals global disparities in resource flows. Using material flow analysis, alternative indicators, and new country clusters, this study updates earlier research and identifies a new phase of intensified disparities since 2015, with rising net outflows of resources from low-income countries (LICs) to high-income countries (HICs). From 1970 to 2024, HICs accumulated 290 gigatons (Gt) of raw material equivalents (RMEs) as net imports, while upper-middle-income, lower-middle-income, and low-income countries net-exported 164 Gt, 53.1 Gt, and 9.6 Gt, respectively. In a relative sense, LICs consume 13.3 percent less RMEs than they extract domestically, while HICs consume 25.4 percent more. This study challenges assumptions about global divisions of labor: not all HICs are net-importers of RMEs, nor are all LICs net-exporters. However, net-exporter HICs earn more than net-exporter LICs, and net-importer HICs spend less than net-importer LICs. On average, LICs export 6 tons of RMEs to earn what HICs earns from 1 ton; for net-exporter LICs, this ratio rises to 12.7 tons. The more a country exploits the environment, domestically or abroad, the more it earns.
References
Alonso-Fernández, Pablo and Rosa M. Regueiro-Ferreira. 2022. “Extractivism, ecologically unequal exchange and environmental impact in South America: A study using Material Flow Analysis (1990–2017).” Ecological Economics 194:107351.
Amin, Samir. 1974. Accumulation on a World Scale: A Critique of the Theory of Underdevelopment. New York and London: Monthly Review Press.
Bai, Yikang and Jennifer Givens. 2021. “Ecologically unequal exchange of plastic waste? A longitudinal analysis of international trade in plastic waste.” Journal of World-Systems Research 27(1):265-287.
Brolin, John. 2007. The bias of the world: Theories of unequal exchange in history. Lund, Sweden: Human Ecology Division, Lund University.
Brolin, John and Astrid Kander. 2022. “Global trade in the Anthropocene: A review of trends and direction of environmental factor flows during the Great Acceleration.” The Anthropocene Review 9(1):71-110.
Bunker, Stephen G. 1984. “Modes of extraction, unequal exchange, and the progressive underdevelopment of an extreme periphery: the Brazilian Amazon, 1600-1980.” American Journal of Sociology 89(5):1017-1064.
_____. 2019. “Toward a Theory of Ecologically Unequal Exchange.” Pp. 13-47 in Ecologically unequal exchange: environmental injustice in comparative and historical perspective, edited by R. Scott Frey, P. K. Gellert, and H. F. Dahms. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cahen-Fourot, Louison and Nelo Magalhães. 2023. “The accumulation–metabolism nexus: internationalization, labour–capital relations, and material flows of French capitalism since the post-war era.” Socio-Economic Review 22(4):1921-1946.
Chase-Dunn, Christopher K. 1998. Global Formation: Structures of the World-economy. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation [CSIRO]. 2022. Technical annex for Global Material Flows Database - 2021 edition. Canberra, Australia: CSIRO.
Cope, Zak. 2019. The Wealth of (Some) Nations: Imperialism and the Mechanics of Value Transfer. London, United Kingdom: Pluto Press.
Corsi, Giulio, Raffaele Guarino, Enrique Muñoz-Ulecia, Alessandro Sapio, and Pier P. Franzese. 2024. “Uneven development and core-periphery dynamics: A journey into the perspective of ecologically unequal exchange.” Environmental Science & Policy 157(2024):103778.
Cran, William and Greg Barker [Director]. 2002. Commanding Heights: An Interview with Milton Friedman: America’s Best Known Libertarian Economist. DVD. Arlington, Virginia: Public Broadcasting Service (PBS).
Dorninger, Christian and Alf Hornborg. 2015. “Can EEMRIO analyses establish the occurrence of ecologically unequal exchange.” Ecological Economics 119:414-418.
Dorninger, Christian and Nina Eisenmenger. 2016. “South America’s biophysical involvement in international trade: the physical trade balances of Argentina, Bolivia, and Brazil in the light of ecologically unequal exchange.” Journal of Political Ecology 23(1):394-409.
Dorninger, Christian, Alf Hornborg, David J Abson, Henrik Von Wehrden, Anke Schaffartzik, Stefan Giljum, John-Oliver Engler, Robert L. Feller, Klaus Hubacek, and Hanspeter Wieland. 2021a. “Global patterns of ecologically unequal exchange: Implications for sustainability in the 21st century.” Ecological Economics 179:106824.
Dorninger, Christian, Henrik von Wehrden, Fridolin Krausmann, Martin Bruckner, Kuishuang Feng, Klaus Hubacek, Karl-Heinz Erb, and David J. Abson. 2021b. “The effect of industrialization and globalization on domestic land-use: A global resource footprint perspective.” Global Environmental Change 69:102311.
Emmanuel, Arghiri. 1972. Unequal Exchange: A Study of the Imperialism of Trade. London and New York: The Monthly Review Press.
Foster, John B. and Paul Burkett. 2018. “Value isn’t everything.” Monthly Review 70(6):1-17.
Foster, John B. and Hannah Holleman. 2014. “The theory of unequal ecological exchange: a Marx-Odum dialectic.” Journal of Peasant Studies 41(2):199-233.
Galtung, Johan. 1971. “Structural Theory of Imperialism.” Journal of Peace Research 8(2):81-117.
Gellert, Paul K., R. Scott Frey, and Harry F. Dahms. 2017. “Introduction to ecologically unequal exchange in comparative perspective.” Journal of World-Systems Research 23(2):226-235.
Grossman, Henryk. 1929. The Law of Accumulation and Breakdown of the Capitalist System. Leipzig, Germany: Hirschfeld.
Hickel, Jason, Christian Dorninger, Hanspeter Wieland, and Intan Suwandi. 2022. “Imperialist appropriation in the world economy: drain from the global south through unequal exchange, 1990–2015.” Global Environmental Change 73:102467.
Hickel, Jason, Dylan Sullivan, and Huzaifa Zoomkawala. 2021. “Plunder in the post-colonial era: quantifying drain from the global south through unequal exchange, 1960–2018.” New Political Economy 26(6):1030-1047.
Hornborg, Alf. 1998. “Towards an ecological theory of unequal exchange: articulating world system theory and ecological economics.” Ecological Economics 25(1):127-136.
_____. 2009. “Zero-sum world: challenges in conceptualizing environmental load displacement and ecologically unequal exchange in the world-system.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 50(3-4):237-262.
_____. 2015. “Why economics needs to be distinguished from physics, and why economists need to talk to physicists: a response to Foster and Holleman.” Journal of Peasant Studies 42(1):187-192.
Hornborg, Alf and Joan Martinez-Alier. 2016. “Introduction: Ecologically unequal exchange and ecological debt.” Journal of Political Ecology 23(1)328-333.
International Monetary Fund [IMF]. 2006. World Economic Outlook, April 2007. New York, United States: IMF.
Jorgenson, Andrew K. 2006. “Unequal ecological exchange and environmental degradation: A theoretical proposition and cross‐national study of deforestation, 1990–2000.” Rural Sociology 71(4)685-712.
_____. 2016. “Environment, development, and ecologically unequal exchange.” Sustainability 8(227):1-15.
Jorgenson, Andrew K., Kelly Austin, and Christopher Dick. 2009. “Ecologically unequal exchange and the resource consumption/environmental degradation paradox: a panel study of less-developed countries, 1970—2000.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 50(3-4):263-284.
Jorgenson, Andrew K, and Brett Clark. 2009. “The economy, military, and ecologically unequal exchange relationships in comparative perspective: a panel study of the ecological footprints of nations, 1975—2000.” Social Problems 56(4):621-646.
Kitzes, Justin. 2013. “An Introduction to Environmentally-Extended Input-Output Analysis.” Resources 2(4):489-503.
Köhler, Gernot. 1998. “The structure of global money and world tables of unequal exchange.” Journal of World-Systems Research 4(2):145-168.
Krausmann, Fridolin, Heinz Schandl, Nina Eisenmenger, Stefan Giljum, and Tim Jackson. 2017. “Material Flow Accounting: Measuring Global Material Use for Sustainable Development.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 42(2017):647-675.
Martinez-Alier, Joan. 2002. “The ecological debt.” Kurswechsel 4(2002):5-16.
Martinez-Alier, Joan, Federico Demaria, Leah Temper, and Mariana Walter. 2016. “Changing social metabolism and environmental conflicts in India and South America.” Journal of Political Ecology 23(1):467-491.
Moran, Daniel D., Manfred Lenzen, Keiichiro Kanemoto, and Arne Geschke. 2013. “Does ecologically unequal exchange occur?” Ecological Economics 89:177-186.
Nordlund, Carl. 2014. “Preceding and governing measurements: an Emmanuelian conceptualization of ecological unequal exchange.” Structures of the World Political Economy and the Future of Global Conflict and Cooperation. 2014:315-346.
Ohlin, Bertil Gotthard. 1933. Interregional and International Trade. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Olk, Christopher. 2024. “How much a dollar cost: Currency hierarchy as a driver of ecologically unequal exchange.” World Development 180(2024):106649.
Oppon, Eunice, Adolf Acquaye, Taofeeq Ibn-Mohammed, and Lenny Koh. 2018. “Modelling multi-regional ecological exchanges: The case of UK and Africa.” Ecological Economics 147(2018):422-435.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. 2021. Building more resilient and sustainable global value chains through responsible business conduct. Paris, France: OECD.
Oulu, Martin. 2015. “The unequal exchange of Dutch cheese and Kenyan roses: Introducing and testing an LCA-based methodology for estimating ecologically unequal exchange.” Ecological Economics 119:372-383.
Paredis, Erik, Gert Goeminne, Wouter Vanhove, Jesse Lambrecht, and Frank Maes. 2009. The Concept of Ecological Debt: Its Meaning and Applicability in International Policy. Ghent, Belgium: Academia Press.
Prebisch, Râul. 1950. The Economic Development of Latin America and its Principal Problems. New York, United States: United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America.
Rammelt, Crelis F. 2024. “How entropy drives us towards degrowth.” Real World Economics Review 107:2-7.
Ricardo, David. 1817. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London, United Kingdom: John Murray.
Ricci, Andrea. 2023. “Ecologically unequal exchange and the value of money.” Capitalism Nature Socialism 34(3):22-42.
_____. 2021. Value and unequal exchange in international trade: The geography of global capitalist exploitation. London and New York: Routledge.
Rice, James. 2007. “Ecological unequal exchange: International trade and uneven utilization of environmental space in the world system.” Social Forces 85(3):1369-1392.
Rivera-Basques, Luisa, Rosa Duarte, and Julio Sánchez-Chóliz. 2021. “Unequal ecological exchange in the era of global value chains: the case of Latin America.” Ecological Economics 180(2021):106881.
Roos, Andreas. 2022. “Global asymmetries in the rise of solar power: An LCA-based account of ecologically unequal exchange between Germany and China 2002–2018.” Ecological Economics 199(2022):107484.
Samaniego, Pablo, María Cristina Vallejo, and Joan Martínez-Alier. 2017. “Commercial and biophysical deficits in South America, 1990–2013.” Ecological Economics 133(2017):62-73.
Schaffartzik, Anke, Magdalena Sachs, Dominik Wiedenhofer, and Nina Eisenmenger. 2014. “Environmentally extended input-output analysis.” University of Klagenfurt, Social Ecology, Working Paper No. 154.
Schandl, Heinz, Marina Fischer‐Kowalski, James West, Stefan Giljum, Monika Dittrich, Nina Eisenmenger, Arne Geschke, Mirko Lieber, Hanspeter Wieland, and Anke Schaffartzik. 2018. “Global material flows and resource productivity: forty years of evidence.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 22(4):827-838.
Shandra, John M., Christopher Leckband, Laura A. McKinney, and Bruce London. 2009. “Ecologically Unequal Exchange, World Polity, and Biodiversity Loss: A Cross-National Analysis of Threatened Mammals.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 50(3-4):285-310.
Singer, Hans W. 1950. “Gains and Losses from Trade and Investment in Under- Developed Countries.” American Economic Review 40(2):473-485.
Steen-Olsen, Kjartan, Jan Weinzettel, Gemma Cranston, A. Ertug Ercin, and Edgar G. Hertwich. 2012. “Carbon, Land, and Water Footprint Accounts for the European Union: Consumption, Production, and Displacements through International Trade.” Environmental Science & Technology 46(20):10883-10891.
Theis, Nicholas, Mauricio Betancourt, and Amanda Sikirica. 2024. “Appraising Sociological Approaches to Ecologically Unequal Exchange: Theoretical Considerations and Quantitative Consequences.” Journal of World-Systems Research 30(2):610-634.
Tong, Kate, Li Li, Knut Breivik, and Frank Wania. 2022. “Ecological unequal exchange: Quantifying emissions of toxic chemicals embodied in the global trade of chemicals, products, and waste.” Environmental Research Letters 17(4):044054.
United Nations Environmental Programme [UNEP]. 2021. The use of natural resources in the economy: A Global Manual on Economy Wide Material Flow Accounting. Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1976. “Semi-peripheral countries and the contemporary world crisis.” Theory and Society 3(4):461-483.
Warlenius, Rikard. 2016. “Linking ecological debt and ecologically unequal exchange: stocks, flows, and unequal sink appropriation.” Journal of Political Ecology 23(1):364-380.
WU Vienna. 2023. “Material flows by material group, 1970-2024. Visualisation based upon the UN IRP Global Material Flows Database.” Retrieved March 09, 2025 (https://www.materialflows.net/visualisation-centre/data-visualisations/).
Yu, Yang, Kuishuang Feng, and Klaus Hubacek. 2014. “China’s unequal ecological exchange.” Ecological Indicators 47(2014):156-163.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Crelis Rammelt, Raimon C. Ylla-Catala
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
