The System Changes, Inequality Does Not
Green Growth, Climate Governance, and Persistent Global Inequalities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2026.1395Keywords:
Climate Inequality, Ecologically Unequal Exchange, Techno-colonialism, Climate Governance, Global SouthAbstract
This article examines climate change as a systemic outcome of global inequality rather than a purely environmental failure. Drawing on a world-systems perspective, it argues that the contemporary climate crisis is embedded in the asymmetric distribution of economic, technological, and political power that structures the global order. The analysis focuses on three interconnected arenas—economic, technological, and political—through which climate-related inequalities are produced and reproduced.
In the economic arena, the green transition unfolds within deeply uneven global value chains, allowing countries in the Global North to sustain high levels of consumption while externalizing ecological and social costs to the Global South. The technological arena shows how digitalization and low-carbon technologies reinforce new forms of dependency through intellectual property regimes, data extraction, and control over critical minerals. In the political arena, multilateral climate governance remains shaped by Northern preferences, market-oriented mechanisms, and technocratic decision-making, limiting the scope for addressing historical responsibility and redistribution.
By situating climate change within these intersecting arenas, the article demonstrates that inequality is not an unintended side effect of climate policy but a politically produced condition that shapes vulnerability and response capacity. The climate crisis thus appears as a manifestation of a broader crisis of the global order, one that cannot be addressed without redistributing power and reorienting global governance toward planetary limits.
References
Althouse, J., Lucas Cahen-Fourot, Berenice Carballa-Smichowski, Cédric Durand, and Stefan Knauss. 2023. “Ecologically unequal exchange and uneven development patterns along global value chains.” World Development170:106308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106308
Álvarez, Ignacio. 2025. “Ciencia, tecnología e innovación: Trinomio esencial para el desarrollo sostenible.” Política Exterior. https://www.politicaexterior.com/ciencia-tecnologia-e-innovacion-trinomio-esencial-para-el-desarrollo-sostenible/
Anderson, Kevin, and Alice Bows. 2011. “Beyond ‘dangerous’ climate change: Emission scenarios for a new world.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 369(1934):20–44. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0290
Azad, Rohini, and Sabyasachi Chakraborty. 2023. “An Indian Green Deal: Greening our way out of the pandemic.” Ecological Economics 209:107830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107830
Azamar-Alonso, Alejandra, and Gabriela Carrillo-González. 2017. “Extractivismo y deuda ecológica en América Latina.” Luna Azul (45):400–418. https://doi.org/10.17151/luaz.2017.45.20
Bertinat, Pablo J., and Juan Chemes. 2022. “Transición energética y disputa de sentidos.” Pp. 131–140 in Informe Ambiental 2022: Abordar una transición socioecológica integral, edited by A. Napoli and P. Marchegiani. Buenos Aires: Fundación Ambiente y Recursos Naturales.
Borrás, Susana. 2006. “Refugiados ambientales: El nuevo desafío del derecho internacional del medio ambiente.” Revista de Derecho 19(2):85–108.
Cantamutto, Francisco J., and Guido Peinado. 2024. Deuda ecológica y deuda externa: Lineamientos y propuestas para la transición ecosocial en Argentina. Buenos Aires: Equipo Transiciones.
Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET). 2026. "Country Activity Tracker: Artificial Intelligence." Georgetown University.
Clapp, Jennifer, and Eric Helleiner. 2012. “International political economy and the environment: Back to the basics?” International Affairs 88(3):485–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01085.x
Couldry, Nick, and Ulises A. Mejias. 2019. “The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism”. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Dorninger, Christian, Alf Hornborg, David J. Abson, Henrik von Wehrden, Anke Schaffartzik, Stefan Giljum, Jan O. Engler, Richard L. Feller, Klaus Hubacek, and Helmut Wieland. 2021. “Global patterns of ecologically unequal exchange.” Ecological Economics 179:106824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106824
Estenssoro, Fernando, and Eduardo Devés. 2013. “Antecedentes históricos del debate ambiental global.” Estudios Ibero-Americanos 39(2):237–261.
Fanning, Andrew L., and Jason Hickel. 2023. “Compensation for atmospheric appropriation.” Nature Sustainability6(9):1077–1086. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-023-01130-8
Forcinito, Karina, Guido Peinado, and Pablo Varela. 2024. La crisis ecosocial bajo la perspectiva de la economía ecológica. Buenos Aires: Fundación Ambiente y Recursos Naturales.
G20 Extraordinary Committee of Independent Experts on Global Inequality. 2025. G20 Global Inequality Report. Johannesburg: G20 South Africa.
Ghosh, Jayati. 2022. “Globalisation and deglobalisation: The impact and the alternatives.” Intereconomics 57(6):342–343.
Ghosh, Jayati, Sabyasachi Chakraborty, and Debojyoti Das. 2023. “El imperialismo climático en el siglo XXI.” El Trimestre Económico 90(357). https://doi.org/10.20430/ete.v90i357.1785
Harvold Kvangraven, Ingrid, Kai Koddenbrock, and Ndongo Samba Sylla. 2020. “Financial subordination and uneven financialization in 21st century Africa.” Community Development Journal 56(2):288–307.
Hickel, Jason. 2020. “Quantifying national responsibility for climate breakdown.” The Lancet Planetary Health4(9):e399–e404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30196-0
Hickel, Jason, Christian Dorninger, Helmut Wieland, and Intan Suwandi. 2022. “Imperialist appropriation in the world economy.” Global Environmental Change 73:102467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102467
Hornborg, Alf. 2003. “The unequal exchange of time and space.” Journal of Ecological Anthropology 7(1).
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2022. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jenkins, T. N. 1996. “Democratising the global economy by ecologicalising economics.” Ecological Economics16(3):227–238.
Kwet, Michael. 2019. “Digital Colonialism: US Empire and the New Imperialism in the Global South.” Race & Class 60 (4): 3–26.
Lander, Edgardo. 2023. “La transición energética corporativa-colonial.” In Transiciones justas. Buenos Aires: CLACSO–Oxfam.
Lawrence, P., Janzwood, S., & Homer-Dixon, T. (2022). "What is a polycrisis?" Cascade Institute, University of Waterloo.
López Terán, Hugo R. 2021. “Dineros alternativos.” Revista Economía 73(117):79–92. https://doi.org/10.29166/economia.v73i117.2485
Malm, A., & Hornborg, A. 2014. “The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative”. The Anthropocene Review, 1(1), 62–69.
Maslej, N., et al. 2025. The AI Index Report 2025. Stanford, CA: Institute for Human-Centered AI, Stanford University
Mickelson, Karin. 2005. “Leading towards a level playing field.” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 43(1–2):137–170. https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.1347
Oxfam. 2024. Combatir la desigualdad de las emisiones de carbono. Oxford: Oxfam.
Oxfam. 2025. From private profit to public power. Oxford: Oxfam. https://www.oxfam.org/en/research/private-profit-public-power-financing-development-not-oligarchy
Peinado, Guido. 2019. “Economía ecológica y comercio internacional.” Revista Economía 70(112):53–69. https://doi.org/10.29166/economia.v70i112.2046
Pérez Dueñas, Luis, and Florent Marcellesi. 2010. “Pensar antes de compensar.” Ecología Política (39).
Pérez Rincón, Mario A. 2012. “Conceptualización sobre el desarrollo sostenible.” Punto de Vista 3(5):139–158.
Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo. 2024. Salir del estancamiento. New York: PNUD.
_______. 2025. UNDP debt update. New York: PNUD.
Rice, James. 2009. “North–South relations and the ecological debt.” Critical Sociology 35(2):225–252.
Roberts, J. Timmons, and Bradley Parks. 2009. “Ecologically unequal exchange and climate justice.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 50(3–4):385–409.
Roca Jusmet, Jordi, and Ester Padilla Rosa. 2021. “Globalización y responsabilidad.” Revista de Economía Crítica(31):1–18. https://doi.org/10.46661/rec.10311
Rodrik, Dani. 2023. “Los límites de la gobernanza.” Barcelona: CIDOB.
Simpson, Mark. 2018. “The Anthropocene as colonial discourse.” Environment and Planning D 36(1):1–19.
Svampa, Maristella. 2019. “Neo-extractivism in Latin America: Socio-environmental Conflicts, the Territorial Turn, and New Political Narratives”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
T20 South Africa. 2025. "Recognising diverse decarbonisation routes: Insights from the Brazilian case on CBAM's carbon accounting gaps." T20 Policy Brief.
Taneja, A., Kamande, A., Guharay Gomez, C., Abed, D., Lawson, M., & Mukhia, N. 2025. “Takers not Makers: The unjust poverty and unearned wealth of colonialism”. Oxfam International.
Tassara, Carlo, and Simone Cecchini. 2016. “Agenda 2030 y desigualdad.” Pensamiento Propio (44). https://revistasnicaragua.cnu.edu.ni/index.php/pensamientopropio/article/view/3675
UNESCO. 2021. UNESCO Science Report. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54675/JSZP2853
_______. 2022. Global Education Monitoring Report 2022. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
Wallerstein, I. (1974). The Modern World-System, vol. I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. Academic Press.
_______. (2004). World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Duke University Press.
World Bank. 2021. Debt: Management, transparency, statistics and sustainability. Washington, DC: World Bank.
_______. 2023. World Development Report 2023. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1975-3
World Intellectual Property Organization. 2023. World Intellectual Property Indicators 2023. Geneva: WIPO.
_______. 2025. World Intellectual Property Indicators 2025: Highlights. Geneva: WIPO.
Zhang, Weimin, and Benjamin K. Sovacool. 2025. "The 'Triple Burden' Effect and 'Pressure-Opportunity Paradox' of Net-Zero Transitions: Exploring the Political Economy of Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) Implementation in the Global South." Energy Strategy Reviews 62:101913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2025.101913
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Gala Kumec
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
