Contesting Corporate Transgenic Crops in a Semi Peripheral Context: The Case of the Anti-GM movement in India

Authors

  • Devparna Roy University of Puget Sound

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2015.528

Keywords:

anti-GM movement, India, anti-corporate, coalition politics

Abstract

Market penetration by the hegemonic core state's agricultural biotechnology firms has been preceded and accompanied by a vigorous anti-genetically modified seeds (anti-GM) movement in semi-peripheral India. To understand the extent of anti-imperialism and anti-capitalism exhibited by the Indian state, it is useful to investigate the character of democratizing forces-such as the anti-GM movement-which interact with and shape the state. I use primary and secondary data sources to analyze the anti-GM movement in India and argue that the movement is anti-corporate without being anti-capitalist. Further, it is counter-hegemonic but not anti-systemic. These four traits reflect the strengths and weaknesses of exemplary coalition-building between right-wing nationalists, centrists, and left activists. The Indian anti-GM movement suffered an early failure when the Indian state commercialized Bt cotton seeds in 2002, following the entry of unauthorized Bt cotton seeds and lobbying by farmers' groups for legalization of Bt cotton seeds. However, an effective coalition between the right-wing, centrist, and left elements was built by about 2006. This was followed by a most significant victory for the anti-GM movement in February 2010, when the Indian state placed an indefinite moratorium on the commercialization of Bt brinjal seeds. A second, more qualified, victory was achieved by the anti-GM movement when the Indian state placed a hold on field trials of GM crops in July 2014. The anti-GM coalition has been successful in pressing ideologically different political parties to take steps against the multinational seed firms based in core states. Further, it has enabled the Indian state to move from a sub-imperialist to an anti-imperialist role regarding GM seeds. But until the anti-GM coalition in India resolves its inner contradictions and becomes resolutely anti-capitalist and anti-systemic, it will not be able to effectively challenge the anti-imperialist Indian state's pro-capitalist stance regarding GM seeds and industrial agriculture.

References

Bello, Walden. 2002. “Towards a Deglobalized World.” Pp. 292-295, in Global Backlash: Citizen Initiatives for a Just World Economy, edited by Robin Broad. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

Chase-Dunn, Christopher. 1990. “Resistance to Imperialism: Semiperipheral Actors.” Review 13 (1): 1-31.

______. 2006. “Globalization: A World-Systems Perspective.” Pp. 79-105, in Global Social Change: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, edited by Christopher Chase-Dunn and Salvatore J. Babones. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Dutta, Mohan J. 2012. Voices of Resistance: Communication and Social Change. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.

Goldfrank, Walter. 1978. “Fascism and World-Economy.” Pp. 75-120, in Social Change in the Capitalist World-Economy, edited by Barbara H. Kaplan. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

Herring, Ronald J. and Frank Shotkoski. 2011. “Eggplant Surprise: The Puzzle of India’s First Transgenic Vegetable.” Scientific American Worldview. Retrieved March 10, 2015 (http://www.saworldview.com/archive/2011/download-the-2011-issue/).

Hopkins, Terence K. and Immanuel Wallerstein. 1986. “Commodity Chains in the World Economy Prior to 1800.” Review 10(1):157-170.

Jayaraman, K.S. 2012. “India Investigates Bt Cotton Claims.” Nature, February 15, Retrieved March 9, 2015 ( http://www.nature.com/news/india-investigates-bt-cotton-claims-1.10015).

Kuruganti, Kavitha. 2011. “‘Monsanto Quit India’ Day Marked Across the Country.” Alliance for Holistic and Sustainable Agriculture. Retrieved March 10, 2015 (http://www.kisanswaraj.in/2011/12/13/monsanto-quit-india-day-marked-across-the-country/).

McMichael, Philip D. 2000. Development and Social Change: A Global Perspective, 3rd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

______. 2013. “Globalization: A Project in Crisis.” Pp. 75-87 in Global Political Economy: Contemporary Theories, 2nd ed., edited by Ronen Palan. New York: Routledge.

Ramamurthy, Priti. 2004. “Why Is Buying A ‘Madras’ Cotton Shirt A Political Act? A Feminist Commodity Chain Analysis.” Feminist Studies 30(3):734-769.

______. 2011. “Rearticulating Caste: The Global Cottonseed Commodity Chain and the Paradox of Smallholder Capitalism in South India.” Environment and Planning A, 43: 1035-1056.

Ramanna, Anitha. 2006. India’s Policy on Genetically Modified Crops, Asia Research Center Working Paper 15. London: Asia Research Center (ARC), London School of Economics & Political Science.

Roy, Devparna. 2006. Farming “White Gold”: Early Experiences with Genetically Engineered Cotton Production in Gujarat, India, PhD. thesis, Cornell University. USA.

______. 2010. “Of Choices and Dilemmas: Bt Cotton and Self-Identified Organic Cotton Farmers in Gujarat.” Asian Biotechnology and Development Review 12(1):51-79.

______. 2012. “Cultivating Bt Cotton in Gujarat (India): Self-Identified Organic Cotton Farmers Revisited.” Asian Biotechnology and Development Review 14(2):67-92.

______. 2013.”Toward Genetic Democracy? Seed Sovereignty, Neoliberal Food Regime, and Transgenic Crops in India.” Food Sovereignty: A Critical Dialogue. Yale University Conference Paper #64, Retrieved March 10, 2015 (http://www.yale.edu/agrarianstudies/foodsovereignty/pprs/64_Roy_2013.pdf).

______. 2014. “To Bt or Not to Bt? State, Civil Society, and Firms Debate Transgenic Seeds in Democratic India.” Pp. 153-169 in The Neoliberal Regime in the Agri-Food Sector: Crisis, Resilience, and Restructuring, edited by Steven A. Wolf and Alessandro Bonanno. New York: Routledge.

Roy, Devparna, Ronald J. Herring, and Charles C. Geisler. 2007. “Naturalizing Transgenics: Loose Seeds, Official Seeds, and Risk in the Decision Matrix of Gujarati Cotton Farmers.” Journal of Development Studies 43(1):158-176.

Schumpeter, Joseph A. [1941] 1976. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Reprint, New York: Harper & Row.

Scoones, Ian. 2008. “Mobilizing Against GM Crops in India, South Africa and Brazil.” Pp. 147-175 in Transnational Agrarian Movements Confronting Globalization, edited by Saturnino M. Borras Jr., Marc Edelman and Cristobal Kay. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Shand, Hope. 2012. “The Big Six: A Profile of Corporate Power in Seeds, Agrochemicals & Biotech.” Pages 10-15 in The Heritage Farm Companion (summer). Seed Savers Exchange. Retrieved on March 10, 2015 (http://www.seedsavers.org/site/pdf/HeritageFarmCompanion_BigSix.pdf).

Sood, Jyotika. 2013. “Monsanto Told to Quit India.” Down to Earth, August 8. Retrieved on March 9, 2015 (http://www.downtoearth.org.in/content/quit-monsanto-protest-near-parliament).

Subramaniam, Mangala. 2015. “Introduction: States and Social Movements in the Modern World-System.” Journal of World Systems Research.

The Economic Times. 2012. “India’s Seed Industry to Grow by 53 % by 2015: Assocham.” Retrieved on March 10, 2015 (http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2012-12-09/news/35705464_1_hybrid-seeds-quality-seeds-high-yielding-varieties).

Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1984. The Politics of the World-Economy: The States, the Movements, and the Civilizations. New York: Cambridge University Press.

______. 2004. World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

______. 2013. “Whose Interests are Served by the BRICS?” Commentary No. 352, May 1. Retrieved on March 9, 2015 (http://www.iwallerstein.com/interests-served-brics/)

Downloads

Published

2015-02-26

How to Cite

Roy, D. (2015). Contesting Corporate Transgenic Crops in a Semi Peripheral Context: The Case of the Anti-GM movement in India. Journal of World-Systems Research, 21(1), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2015.528

Issue

Volume 21, Number 1, Winter/Spring 2015

Section

States and Social Movements in the Modern World-System

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.