Analyzing Global Commodity Chains and Social Reproduction
Mapping the Household within Multi-Sited and Hierarchical Capitalist Relations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2023.1132Keywords:
Inequality, Households, Gender, Global Commodity Chain, GCCs, Development, CapitalismAbstract
World-systems analysts argue that households take on a structural role within the capitalist system to mediate pressures exerted by the state and economic actors. Underpinning this view is the supply of low-paid and waged labor by household members in the process of social reproduction and the role of households as sites of commodity consumption. Here, I argue that the analytical choice to use the features of low-waged households renders a partial analysis of their structural location within a multi-sited capitalist system. While acknowledging that households across the Global Commodity Chain (GCC) are neither spatially segregated (i.e., global North, global South) nor solely spaces of production or consumption, I suggest that households differ in their structural location within a multi-sited capitalist system, subject to their incidence on the instantiation of hierarchical capitalist relations. First, “core” households differ from their peripheral counterparts via their reliance on financial assetization and capital accumulation in the core for (intergenerational) social reproduction. Second, in the process of social reproduction, core household excess commodity consumption generates metabolic differentials that fuel hierarchical relations of production and place core households in a more central location within a multi-sited capitalist system compared to peripheral ones. Third, the analysis of hierarchical capitalist relations and GCCs focuses on capital accumulation and the extraction of (women’s) household unpaid labor in the periphery. I argue that to more fully capture the extraction of unpaid labor across the GCC, household fluidity and heterogeneity and associated variation in intra-household divisions of labor must be analytically considered.
References
Aalbers, Manuel B., Zac J. Taylor, Tobias J. Klinge, and Rodrigo Fernandez. 2023. “In Real Estate Investment We Trust: State DE-Risking and the Ownership of Listed US and German Residential Real Estate Investment Trusts.” Economic Geography 99(3): 312–35.
Adkins, Lisa, Melinda Cooper, and Martijn Konings. 2020. The Asset Economy. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
______. 2021. “Class in the 21st Century: Asset Inflation and the New Logic of Inequality.” Environment & Planning A 53(3): 548–72.
Albertini, M., M. Kohli, and C. Vogel. 2007. “Intergenerational Transfers of Time and Money in European Families: Common Patterns-Different Regimes.” Journal of European Social Policy 17(4): 319–34.
Albertini, Marco, and Jonas Radl. 2012. “Intergenerational Transfers and Social Class: Inter-Vivos Transfers as Means of Status Reproduction?” Acta Sociologica 55(2): 107–23.
Alvaredo, F., L. Chancel, T. Piketty, E. Saez, and G. Zucman. 2017. “Global Inequality Dynamics: New Findings from WID. World.” American Economic Review 107(5): 404–9.
Bakker, Isabella. 2007. “Social Reproduction and the Constitution of a Gendered Political Economy.” New Political Economy 12(4): 541–556.
Bakker, I. and S. Gill, eds. 2003. Power, Production, and Social Reproduction: Human In/security in the Global Political Economy. New York: Springer.
Bakker, I. and R. Silvey, eds. 2012. Beyond States and Markets: The Challenges of Social Reproduction. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
Barrett, John, Glen Peters, Thomas Wiedmann, Kate Scott, Manfred Lenzen, Katy Roelich, and Corinne Le Quéré. 2013. “Consumption-Based GHG Emission Accounting: A UK Case Study.” Climate Policy 13(4): 451–70.
Bergeron, Suzanne. 2011. “Economics, Performativity, and Social Reproduction in Global Development.” Globalizations 8(2): 151–161.
Birch, Kean, and Callum Ward. 2022. “Assetization and the ‘New Asset Geographies.’” Dialogues in Human Geography 1–21.
Bishop, Matthew Louis, and Anthony Payne. 2021. “The Political Economies of Different Globalizations: Theorizing Reglobalization.” Globalizations 18(1): 1–21.
Braun, Benjamin. 2022. “Fueling Financialization: The Economic Consequences of Funded Pensions.” New Labor Forum 31(1): 70–79.
Bricker, Jesse, Kevin B. Moore, and Jeffrey Thompson. 2019. “Trends in Household Portfolio Composition.” Pp. 53–96 in Handbook of US Consumer Economics, edited by Andrew Haughwout and Benjamin Mandel. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
Brooks, Andrew. 2013. “Stretching Global Production Networks: The International Second-Hand Clothing Trade.” Geoforum 44: 10–22.
Bruckner, Benedikt, Yuli Shan, Christina Prell, Yannan Zhou, Honglin Zhong, Kuishuang Feng, and Klaus Hubacek. 2023. “Ecologically Unequal Exchanges Driven by EU Consumption.” Nature Sustainability. 1–12.
Bryant, Lia, and Barbara Pini. 2006. “Towards an Understanding of Gender and Capital in Constituting Biotechnologies in Agriculture.” Sociologia Ruralis 46(4): 261–79.
Cardoso, F. H. and E. Faletto 1979. Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Chiapello, Eve. 2023. "So What is Assetization? Filling Some Theoretical Gaps." Dialogues in Human Geography. 1–4.
Cook, Julia. 2020. “Keeping It in the Family: Understanding the Negotiation of Intergenerational Transfers for Entry into Homeownership.” Housing Studies 36(8): 1193–1211.
Davies, James B., Susanna Sandström, Anthony Shorrocks, and Edward N. Wolff. 2011. “The Level and Distribution of Global Household Wealth: Global Household Wealth.” Economic Journal 121(551): 223–54.
de Grazia, V. and E. Furlough, Eds. 1996. The Sex of Things: Gender and Consumption in Historical Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Dorninger, Christian, Alf Hornborg, David J. Abson, Henrik von Wehrden, Anke Schaffartzik, Stefan Giljum, John-Oliver Engler, et al. 2021. “Global Patterns of Ecologically Unequal Exchange: Implications for Sustainability in the 21st Century.” Ecological Economics: The Journal of the International Society for Ecological Economics 179.
Druta, Oana and Richard Ronald (2017). “Young Adults’ Pathways into Homeownership and the Negotiation of Intra-family Support: A Home, the Ideal Gift.” Sociology 51(4): 783–799.
Dubois, Ghislain, Benjamin Sovacool, Carlo Aall, Maria Nilsson, Carine Barbier, Alina Herrmann, Sébastien Bruyère, et al. 2019. “It Starts at Home? Climate Policies Targeting Household Consumption and Behavioral Decisions Are Key to Low-Carbon Futures.” Energy Research & Social Science 52: 144–58.
Dunaway, Wilma A. 2001. “The Double Register of History: Situating the Forgotten Woman and Her Household in Capitalist Commodity Chains.” Journal of World-Systems Research 7(1): 2–29.
______. 2013. Gendered Commodity Chains: Seeing Women’s Work and Households in Global Production. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
______. 2014. “Bringing Commodity Chain Analysis Back to Its World-Systems Roots: Rediscovering Women’s Work and Households.” Journal of World-Systems Research 20(1): 64–81.
Emslie, C., and K. Hunt. 2009. “‘Live to Work’or ‘Work to Live’? A Qualitative Study of Gender and Work-Life Balance among Men and Women in Mid-Life.” Work & Organization 16(1): 151–72.
Enloe, C. 2013. Seriously!: Investigating Crashes and Crises as If Women Mattered. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Feiveson, Laura and John Sabelhaus. 2018. “How Does Intergenerational Wealth Transmission Affect Wealth Concentration?”. FEDS Notes. Wahington, D.C: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Retrieved July 4, 2023. https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/how-does-intergenerational-wealth-transmission-affect-wealth-concentration-20180601.html.
Friedman, Sam, Dave O’Brien, and Ian McDonald. 2021. “Deflecting Privilege: Class Identity and the Intergenerational Self.” Sociology 55(4): 716–33.
Furstenberg, Frank F. 2020. “Kinship Reconsidered: Research on a Neglected Topic.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 82(1): 364–82.
Furstenberg, Frank F., Lauren E. Harris, Luca Maria Pesando, and Megan N. Reed. 2020. “Kinship Practices among Alternative Family Forms in Western Industrialized Societies.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 82(5): 1403–30.
Furtado, Celso. 2021. “Underdevelopment and Dependence: The Fundamental Connections.” Review of Political Economy 33(1): 7–15.
Gale, W. G., H. Gelfond, J. J. Fichtner, and B. H. Harris. 2020. “The Wealth of Generations, with Special Attention to the Millennials. Measuring Distribution and Mobility of Income and Wealth”. National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w27123.
Gouzoulis, Giorgos, Panagiotis Iliopoulos, and Giorgos Galanis. 2023. “Financialization and the Rise of Atypical Work.” British Journal of Industrial Relations 61(1): 24-45.
Gregson, Nicky, Mike Crang, Jennifer Laws, Tamlynn Fleetwood, and Helen Holmes. 2013. “Moving up the Waste Hierarchy: Car Boot Sales, Reuse Exchange and the Challenges of Consumer Culture to Waste Prevention.” Resources, Conservation, and Recycling 77: 97–107.
Hällsten, Martin, and Max Thaning. 2022. “Wealth as One of the ‘Big Four’ SES Dimensions in Intergenerational Transmissions.” Social Forces; a Scientific Medium of Social Study and Interpretation 100(4): 1533–60.
Hansen, Marianne Nordli, and Øyvind Nicolay Wiborg. 2019. “The Accumulation and Transfers of Wealth: Variations by Social Class.” European Sociological Review. 35(6): 874–893.
Holmes, Seth. 2013. Fresh Fruit, Broken Bodies: Migrant Farmworkers in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hopkins, T. K., and I. Wallerstein. 1977. “Patterns of Development of the Modern World-System.” Review (Fernand Braudel Center) 111–45.
______. 1986. “Commodity Chains in the World Economy Prior to 1800.” Review 10: 157–70.
Ivanova, Diana, Konstantin Stadler, Kjartan Steen-Olsen, Richard Wood, Gibran Vita, Arnold Tukker, and Edgar G. Hertwich. 2016. “Environmental Impact Assessment of Household Consumption: Environmental Impact Assessment of Household Consumption.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 20(3): 526–36.
Katz, Cindi. 2001. “Vagabond Capitalism and the Necessity of Social Reproduction.” Antipode 33(4): 709–728.
Keister, Lisa A., Richard A. Benton, and James W. Moody. 2019. “Cohorts and Wealth Transfers: Generational Changes in the Receipt of Inheritances, Trusts, and Inter Vivos Gifts in the United States.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 59: 1–13.
Kohli, M. 2004. “Intergenerational Transfers and Inheritance: A Comparative View.” Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics 24(1): 266–89.
Lane, Ruth, Ralph Horne, and Jenny Bicknell. 2009. “Routes of Reuse of Second-Hand Goods in Melbourne Households.” The Australian Geographer 40(2): 151–68.
LeBaron, Genevieve, Daniel Mügge, Jacqueline Best, and Colin Hay. 2021. “Blind Spots in IPE: Marginalized Perspectives and Neglected Trends in Contemporary Capitalism.” Review of International Political Economy 28(2): 283–94.
Leopold, T., and T. Schneider. 2011. “Family Events and the Timing of Intergenerational Transfers.” Social Forces 90(2): 595–616.
Mcguire, R. H., J. Smith, and W. G. Martin. 1986. “Patterns of Household Structures and the World-Economy.” Review (Fernand Braudel Center) 10(1): 75–97.
Morelli, Salvatore, Brian Nolan, Juan C. Palomino, and Philippe Van Kerm. 2022. “The Wealth (Disadvantage) of Single-Parent Households.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 702(1): 188–204.
Mullins, Paul R. 2011. “The Archaeology of Consumption.” Annual Review of Anthropology 40(1): 133–44.
Ouma, Stefan. 2023. “Defetishizing the Asset Form.” Dialogues in Human Geography. 1–4.
Palladino, Lenore. M. 2023. “The Contribution of Shareholder Primacy to the Racial Wealth Gap.” The Review of Black Political Economy 50(2): 167–193.
Pearse, Rebecca, and Raewyn Connell. 2016. “Gender Norms and the Economy: Insights from Social Research.” Feminist Economics 22(1): 30–53.
Prügl, Elisabeth. 2021. “Untenable Dichotomies: De-Gendering Political Economy.” Review of International Political Economy 28(2): 295–306.
Sassen, S. (2021). “How to Theorize Globalization: A Comment.” Globalizations 18(5): 792–793.
Standing, Guy. 2014. A Precariat Charter: From Denizens to Citizens. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.
Taylor, Marcus. 2007. “Rethinking the Global Production of Uneven Development.” Globalizations 4(4): 529–542.
Toft, Maren, and Sam Friedman. 2021. “Family Wealth and the Class Ceiling: The Propulsive Power of the Bank of Mum and Dad.” Sociology 55(1): 90–109.
V. Spike Peterson. 2010. “A Long View of Globalization and Crisis.” Globalizations 7(1-2): 187–202.
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1988. “Development: Lodestar or Illusion?” Economic and Political Weekly 23(39): 2017–23.
Wallerstein, I., W. G. Martin, and T. Dickinson. 1982. “Household Structures and Production Processes: Preliminary Theses and Findings.” Review (Fernand Braudel Center) 5(3): 437–58.
Wallerstein, Immanuel and Joan Smith, 1992. “Core-periphery and Household Structures.” Pp. 253–262 in Creating and Transforming Households: The Constraints of the World-Economy, edited by Joan Smith and Immanuel Wallerstein. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Weinzettel, Jan, Edgar G. Hertwich, Glen P. Peters, Kjartan Steen-Olsen, and Alessandro Galli. 2013. “Affluence Drives the Global Displacement of Land Use.” Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions 23(2):433–38.
Wiedmann, Thomas, and Manfred Lenzen. 2018. “Environmental and Social Footprints of International Trade.” Nature Geoscience 11(5): 314–21.
Yeates, Nicola. 2004. “Global Care Chains.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 6(3): 369–91.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Anouk Patel-Campillo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
